v-hono/benchmark/README.md

V-Hono Benchmark

Performance benchmarks for V-Hono web framework.

Backend Comparison

uSockets vs Picoev (200 connections, 100K requests)

Backend	RPS	Avg Latency	P95	P99
uSockets	~22,000	8.75ms	16.66ms	25.73ms
picoev	~15,000	13.36ms	18.89ms	31.66ms

uSockets provides ~50% higher throughput under high concurrency.

High Concurrency Test (500 connections, 100K requests)

Metric	uSockets
RPS	~20,000
Errors	0
Avg Latency	25.04ms
P50	24.32ms
P95	32.97ms
P99	64.59ms

Running Benchmarks

1. Start Test Server

uSockets backend:

v -enable-globals -cc gcc -ldflags "-ldbghelp" benchmark/usockets_server.v -o server.exe
./server.exe

Picoev backend:

v -enable-globals examples/picoev_example.v -o server.exe
./server.exe

2. Run Integration Tests

go run benchmark/usockets_verify.go

3. Run Performance Tests

# 200 connections, 100K requests
go run tests/main.go -url "http://127.0.0.1:9998" -c 200 -n 100000

# 500 connections, 100K requests
go run tests/main.go -url "http://127.0.0.1:9998" -c 500 -n 100000

4. Quick Concurrent Test (PowerShell)

powershell -File benchmark/quick_test.ps1

Test Files

File	Description
usockets_server.v	uSockets test server with full API
usockets_verify.go	Go integration test (17 test cases)
quick_test.ps1	PowerShell concurrent test script
../tests/main.go	Go performance benchmark tool

Test Coverage

The integration test (usockets_verify.go) covers:

• ✅ Basic GET routes (root, health, static)
• ✅ Dynamic routes (single/multi/nested params)
• ✅ Query parameters
• ✅ Response formats (JSON, HTML, custom status)
• ✅ HTTP methods (POST, PUT, DELETE)
• ✅ Error handling (404)
• ✅ Keep-Alive connections
• ✅ Throughput performance