v-hono/benchmark

V-Hono Benchmark

Performance benchmarks for V-Hono web framework.

Framework Comparison (500 connections, 100K requests)

Framework	RPS	Errors	Avg Latency	P50	P95	P99
v-hono (uSockets)	20,231	0	24.62ms	23.65ms	33.82ms	57.29ms
v-hono (picoev)	16,177	0	30.75ms	26.25ms	35.37ms	111.38ms
veb (V官方)	7,278	772	68.06ms	55.79ms	71.62ms	98.90ms

Performance Summary

• v-hono (uSockets) vs veb: 2.78x faster, zero errors
• v-hono (uSockets) vs picoev: 25% faster, better P99 latency
• v-hono (picoev) vs veb: 2.22x faster, zero errors

Running Benchmarks

1. Start Test Server

uSockets backend:

v -enable-globals -cc gcc -ldflags "-ldbghelp" benchmark/usockets_server.v -o server.exe
./server.exe

Picoev backend:

v -enable-globals examples/picoev_example.v -o server.exe
./server.exe

2. Run Integration Tests

go run benchmark/usockets_verify.go

3. Run Performance Tests

# 200 connections, 100K requests
go run tests/main.go -url "http://127.0.0.1:9998" -c 200 -n 100000

# 500 connections, 100K requests
go run tests/main.go -url "http://127.0.0.1:9998" -c 500 -n 100000

4. Quick Concurrent Test (PowerShell)

powershell -File benchmark/quick_test.ps1

Test Files

File	Description
usockets_server.v	uSockets test server with full API
usockets_verify.go	Go integration test (17 test cases)
quick_test.ps1	PowerShell concurrent test script
../tests/main.go	Go performance benchmark tool

Test Coverage

The integration test (usockets_verify.go) covers:

• ✅ Basic GET routes (root, health, static)
• ✅ Dynamic routes (single/multi/nested params)
• ✅ Query parameters
• ✅ Response formats (JSON, HTML, custom status)
• ✅ HTTP methods (POST, PUT, DELETE)
• ✅ Error handling (404)
• ✅ Keep-Alive connections
• ✅ Throughput performance