Framework	RPS	Errors	Avg Latency	P50	P95	P99
v-hono (uSockets)	20,231	0	24.62ms	23.65ms	33.82ms	57.29ms
v-hono (picoev)	16,177	0	30.75ms	26.25ms	35.37ms	111.38ms
veb (V官方)	7,278	772	68.06ms	55.79ms	71.62ms	98.90ms

Performance Summary

v-hono (uSockets) vs veb: 2.78x faster, zero errors
v-hono (uSockets) vs picoev: 25% faster, better P99 latency
v-hono (picoev) vs veb: 2.22x faster, zero errors

Running Benchmarks

1. Start Test Server

uSockets backend:

v -enable-globals -cc gcc -ldflags "-ldbghelp" benchmark/usockets_server.v -o server.exe
./server.exe

Picoev backend:

v -enable-globals examples/picoev_example.v -o server.exe
./server.exe

2. Run Integration Tests

go run benchmark/usockets_verify.go

3. Run Performance Tests

# 200 connections, 100K requests
go run tests/main.go -url "http://127.0.0.1:9998" -c 200 -n 100000

# 500 connections, 100K requests
go run tests/main.go -url "http://127.0.0.1:9998" -c 500 -n 100000

4. Quick Concurrent Test (PowerShell)

powershell -File benchmark/quick_test.ps1

Test Files

File	Description
`usockets_server.v`	uSockets test server with full API
`usockets_verify.go`	Go integration test (17 test cases)
`quick_test.ps1`	PowerShell concurrent test script
`../tests/main.go`	Go performance benchmark tool

Test Coverage

The integration test (usockets_verify.go) covers:

✅ Basic GET routes (root, health, static)
✅ Dynamic routes (single/multi/nested params)
✅ Query parameters
✅ Response formats (JSON, HTML, custom status)
✅ HTTP methods (POST, PUT, DELETE)
✅ Error handling (404)
✅ Keep-Alive connections
✅ Throughput performance